Salvadoran vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Salvadoran
Czechoslovakian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Salvadorans
Czechoslovakians
6.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Salvadoran vs Czechoslovakian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 395,885,602 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.092 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 364,959,932 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 4.4%, a difference of 49.9%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Salvadoran | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.40% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 19.7% | 21.7% |
| Range | 19.3% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 7.2% | 6.9% |
| Median | 6.6% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.3% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.7% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 3.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 4.8% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Salvadorans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Nepalese (6.5%, a difference of 0.17%), Ecuadorian (6.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Barbados (6.5%, a difference of 0.40%), Belizean (6.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and Guyanese (6.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 6.4% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Salvadorans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Netherlands (4.3%, a difference of 0.090%), French (4.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Austrian (4.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and Welsh (4.3%, a difference of 0.53%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Okinawans | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 99.6 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 4.4% |