Bulgarian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Bulgarian
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Bulgarians
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
70.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bulgarian vs Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,671,341 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Bulgarians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.912 and weighted average of 4.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 504,926,469 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 27.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Bulgarian | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia |
Minimum | 0.47% | 0.63% |
Maximum | 45.5% | 14.6% |
Range | 45.0% | 14.0% |
Mean | 4.4% | 5.8% |
Median | 3.5% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 4.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.4% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.8% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 2.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.6% | 2.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Bulgarians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Bulgarians are Lithuanian (4.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.88%), Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.92%), Polish (4.0%, a difference of 0.95%), and Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Sri Lankan (5.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 77.3 /100 | #151 | Good 5.0% |
Albanians | 77.2 /100 | #152 | Good 5.0% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 76.3 /100 | #153 | Good 5.0% |
Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |