Palestinian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Czechoslovakian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Czechoslovakians
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.8%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 27.8% |
| Range | 25.0% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 12.1% |
| Median | 10.2% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Czechoslovakians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%), British (11.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |