Palestinian vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Immigrants from Norway
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Immigrants from Norway
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
88.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,687,358 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 0.32% | 0.18% |
Maximum | 25.3% | 48.4% |
Range | 25.0% | 48.3% |
Mean | 10.8% | 9.6% |
Median | 10.2% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Immigrants from Norway by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |