Palestinian vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Immigrants from Latvia
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Immigrants from Latvia
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Immigrants from Latvia Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,731,697 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Immigrants from Latvia |
Minimum | 0.32% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 25.3% | 17.5% |
Range | 25.0% | 15.6% |
Mean | 10.8% | 9.1% |
Median | 10.2% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 6.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 12.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Immigrants from Latvia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |