Palestinian vs Welsh Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Welsh
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Welsh
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Welsh Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 528,094,274 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Welsh and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.090%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Welsh |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 55.5% |
| Range | 25.0% | 49.6% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 16.0% |
| Median | 10.2% | 11.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 15.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 6.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Welsh by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Welsh are Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.060%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |