Palestinian vs Scottish Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Scottish
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Scottish
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
POVERTY
94.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Scottish Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,309,495 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.88%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Scottish |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.0% | 98.1% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 20.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 23.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 21.3% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Scottish by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Slavic (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |