Carpatho Rusyn vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Czechoslovakian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Czechoslovakians
11.3%
POVERTY
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Carpatho Rusyn vs Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,869,628 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Carpatho Rusyn | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 0.68% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 27.9% | 27.8% |
| Range | 27.2% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 10.1% | 12.1% |
| Median | 9.2% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.6% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.1% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.0% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns and Czechoslovakians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are European (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Zimbabwean (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from North America (11.3%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Zimbabweans | 97.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Europeans | 97.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 96.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Dutch | 96.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Cambodians | 96.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 96.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |