Palestinian vs Slavic Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Slavic
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Slavs
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.5%
POVERTY
93.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Slavic Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,786,783 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.645 and weighted average of 11.5%, a difference of 0.56%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Slavic |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 0.14% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 44.1% |
| Range | 25.0% | 43.9% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 11.4% |
| Median | 10.2% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 7.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 13.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 5.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Slavs by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Scottish (11.5%, a difference of 0.31%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.42%), and Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.45%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |