Palestinian vs British Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
British
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
British
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs British Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,938,105 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of British and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.4%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | British |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.0% | 98.5% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 16.2% |
| Median | 10.2% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 16.3% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and British by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to British are Romanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Finnish (11.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |