Zimbabwean vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Czechoslovakian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Czechoslovakians
11.3%
POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
71st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,186,100 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.175 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 1.2%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Czechoslovakian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.33% |
| Maximum | 19.3% | 27.8% |
| Range | 17.3% | 27.5% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 12.1% |
| Median | 8.4% | 11.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.9% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Czechoslovakians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), European (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Belgium (11.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (11.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (11.3%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.3 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.3 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Europeans | 97.2 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.2 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 96.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 96.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Dutch | 96.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Cambodians | 96.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Indians (Asian) | 96.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |