Palestinian vs Portuguese Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Portuguese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Portuguese
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Portuguese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,939,658 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.201 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.090%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Palestinian | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 0.32% | 1.7% |
| Maximum | 25.3% | 36.0% |
| Range | 25.0% | 34.3% |
| Mean | 10.8% | 11.7% |
| Median | 10.2% | 10.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 8.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 14.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Portuguese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |