Egyptian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty
COMPARE
Egyptian
Czechoslovakian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Egyptians
Czechoslovakians
11.3%
POVERTY
96.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
82nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,768,779 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 11.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 0.55%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Egyptian | Czechoslovakian |
Minimum | 0.75% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 41.9% | 27.8% |
Range | 41.2% | 27.5% |
Mean | 10.7% | 12.1% |
Median | 9.3% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.7% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Egyptians and Czechoslovakians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Irish (11.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Indian (Asian) (11.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Cambodian (11.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Dutch (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (11.3%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 96.7 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Dutch | 96.7 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Cambodians | 96.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 96.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Irish | 96.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants | England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |