Palestinian vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty
COMPARE
Palestinian
Immigrants from Brazil
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Palestinians
Immigrants from Brazil
11.6%
POVERTY
91.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
88.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Palestinian vs Immigrants from Brazil Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,388,270 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Palestinians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.036 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 342,843,961 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Brazil and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.255 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Palestinian | Immigrants from Brazil |
Minimum | 0.32% | 2.3% |
Maximum | 25.3% | 27.4% |
Range | 25.0% | 25.1% |
Mean | 10.8% | 11.3% |
Median | 10.2% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.9% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 13.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Palestinians and Immigrants from Brazil by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Palestinians are Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Brazil are Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Norway (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |