Creek vs Yakama Female Poverty
COMPARE
Creek
Yakama
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Creek
Yakama
17.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
310th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Yakama Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,438,059 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Creek and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.633 and weighted average of 17.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,707 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792 and weighted average of 18.0%, a difference of 6.1%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Creek | Yakama |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 58.7% | 52.1% |
| Range | 55.8% | 44.9% |
| Mean | 21.7% | 20.1% |
| Median | 19.0% | 18.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.3% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 26.8% | 22.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.5% | 9.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.8% | 10.0% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Yakama by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Immigrants from Guatemala (17.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Somalia (17.0%, a difference of 0.10%), British West Indian (17.0%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Mexico (17.0%, a difference of 0.24%), and Dutch West Indian (17.1%, a difference of 0.42%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Central American Indian (18.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Colville (17.8%, a difference of 1.6%), Immigrants from Honduras (17.7%, a difference of 1.8%), Paiute (17.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and Menominee (17.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 17.0% |
| British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 17.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 17.3% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 17.4% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 17.5% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 17.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 17.7% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.8% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 18.0% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 18.6% |