Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
 Chickasaw
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chickasaw
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,789,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 26.6%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw | 
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.99% | 
| Maximum | 19.2% | 35.7% | 
| Range | 16.7% | 34.7% | 
| Mean | 9.5% | 16.2% | 
| Median | 9.3% | 15.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 13.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 18.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 5.4% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 5.4% | 
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279  | Tragic 14.9%  |