Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from El Salvador
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from El Salvador
Chickasaw
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
254th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from El Salvador vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,703,291 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.743 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 2.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from El Salvador | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.1% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 35.7% |
| Range | 95.9% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 15.6% | 16.2% |
| Median | 13.5% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.8% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.2% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.1% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from El Salvador and Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (14.2%, a difference of 0.25%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |