Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Tlingit-Haida
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Tlingit-Haida
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
89.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Tlingit-Haida Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,789,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,855,126 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 0.94%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Tlingit-Haida |
| Minimum | 2.4% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 19.2% | 27.4% |
| Range | 16.7% | 24.9% |
| Mean | 9.5% | 12.4% |
| Median | 9.3% | 10.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 16.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Tlingit-Haida by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (11.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and Sri Lankan (11.7%, a difference of 0.12%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
| New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |