Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chickasaw
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chickasaw
16.1%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
72.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
152nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.0%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,577,503 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.315 and weighted average of 16.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 131,493,414 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 17.5%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.8% | 10.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 98.2% | 90.0% |
Mean | 26.8% | 31.9% |
Median | 18.8% | 25.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 18.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.0% | 37.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.2% | 18.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 19.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.9% | 19.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Father Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Israel (16.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from France (16.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Mexican (16.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Jordanian (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), and South African (16.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 80.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 16.0% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 78.3 /100 | #146 | Good 16.1% |
Colombians | 77.1 /100 | #147 | Good 16.1% |
Nigerians | 76.8 /100 | #148 | Good 16.1% |
South Africans | 75.1 /100 | #149 | Good 16.1% |
Jordanians | 74.2 /100 | #150 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 72.1 /100 | #152 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 72.0 /100 | #153 | Good 16.1% |
Mexicans | 70.1 /100 | #154 | Good 16.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 67.8 /100 | #155 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 66.0 /100 | #156 | Good 16.2% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 62.8 /100 | #157 | Good 16.2% |
Portuguese | 62.3 /100 | #158 | Good 16.2% |
Belizeans | 59.9 /100 | #159 | Average 16.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Delaware (18.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Potawatomi (18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Osage (19.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Immigrants from Dominica (18.9%, a difference of 0.52%), and Nonimmigrants (18.8%, a difference of 0.57%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 18.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 18.8% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 18.9% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 18.9% |
Delaware | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 18.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 19.0% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 19.0% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 19.1% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 19.2% |
Slovaks | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 19.3% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 19.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 19.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 19.8% |