Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Chickasaw
12.2%
POVERTY
58.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
163rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,460,176 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ethiopia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.207 and weighted average of 12.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 20.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.57% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 27.5% | 35.7% |
| Range | 26.9% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 16.2% |
| Median | 11.0% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.0% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.7% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ethiopia are Ethiopian (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Fiji (12.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Colombian (12.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Albania (12.2%, a difference of 0.080%), and Venezuelan (12.2%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.6 /100 | #156 | Good 12.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 62.2 /100 | #157 | Good 12.2% |
| Taiwanese | 61.8 /100 | #158 | Good 12.2% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 60.8 /100 | #159 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 60.4 /100 | #160 | Good 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 59.1 /100 | #161 | Average 12.2% |
| Ethiopians | 59.1 /100 | #162 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 58.6 /100 | #163 | Average 12.2% |
| Colombians | 57.8 /100 | #164 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 57.7 /100 | #165 | Average 12.2% |
| Venezuelans | 56.9 /100 | #166 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 56.7 /100 | #167 | Average 12.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 56.5 /100 | #168 | Average 12.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 55.4 /100 | #169 | Average 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 54.6 /100 | #170 | Average 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |