Immigrants from the Azores vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from the Azores
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from the Azores
Chickasaw
13.1%
POVERTY
6.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from the Azores vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,256,915 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from the Azores and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.482 and weighted average of 13.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 11.7%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from the Azores | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.99% |
Maximum | 24.6% | 35.7% |
Range | 22.8% | 34.7% |
Mean | 11.0% | 16.2% |
Median | 10.5% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.8% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.1% | 18.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.1% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from the Azores by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from the Azores are Malaysian (13.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Ugandan (13.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Panamanian (13.1%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (13.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Moroccan (13.2%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Hmong | 15.0 /100 | #203 | Poor 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 14.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 12.9% |
Tsimshian | 9.2 /100 | #205 | Tragic 13.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 7.0 /100 | #206 | Tragic 13.1% |
Panamanians | 6.6 /100 | #207 | Tragic 13.1% |
Ugandans | 6.2 /100 | #208 | Tragic 13.1% |
Malaysians | 6.1 /100 | #209 | Tragic 13.1% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.1 /100 | #210 | Tragic 13.1% |
Moroccans | 5.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 13.2% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #213 | Tragic 13.3% |
Bermudans | 3.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 13.3% |
Japanese | 3.3 /100 | #215 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 3.3 /100 | #216 | Tragic 13.3% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.2 /100 | #217 | Tragic 13.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |