Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Norway
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Norway
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.7%
POVERTY
88.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
126th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Norway Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,789,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,687,358 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382 and weighted average of 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Norway |
Minimum | 2.4% | 0.18% |
Maximum | 19.2% | 48.4% |
Range | 16.7% | 48.3% |
Mean | 9.5% | 9.6% |
Median | 9.3% | 7.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 3.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 10.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Norway by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Turkey (11.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.35%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Brazil (11.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Soviet Union (11.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Hungary (11.7%, a difference of 0.15%), New Zealander (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Puget Sound Salish (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.9 /100 | #120 | Excellent 11.7% |
New Zealanders | 88.7 /100 | #121 | Excellent 11.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 88.7 /100 | #122 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 88.6 /100 | #123 | Excellent 11.7% |
Soviet Union | 88.4 /100 | #124 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 88.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 11.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 88.0 /100 | #126 | Excellent 11.7% |