Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Belarus
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Belarus
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
113th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Belarus Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,789,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,136,945 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belarus and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.41%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Belarus |
Minimum | 2.4% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 19.2% | 27.2% |
Range | 16.7% | 26.0% |
Mean | 9.5% | 11.1% |
Median | 9.3% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 7.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Belarus by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belarus are Immigrants from Southern Europe (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from China (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), French Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Albanian (11.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and Welsh (11.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 11.6% |
French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Albanians | 90.3 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 89.7 /100 | #116 | Excellent 11.7% |
Sri Lankans | 89.4 /100 | #117 | Excellent 11.7% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #118 | Excellent 11.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 89.0 /100 | #119 | Excellent 11.7% |