Immigrants from Egypt vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Egypt
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Egypt
Chickasaw
11.5%
POVERTY
94.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Egypt vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,409,377 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Egypt and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.497 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 28.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Egypt | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 41.8% | 35.7% |
| Range | 40.5% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 16.2% |
| Median | 9.9% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.6% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 5.4% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Egypt by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Egypt are Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Latvia (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |