Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chickasaw Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Chickasaw
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Chickasaw
14.2%
POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
253rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Chickasaw Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,476,613 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.646 and weighted average of 14.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 3.0%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 0.99% |
| Maximum | 81.9% | 35.7% |
| Range | 80.8% | 34.7% |
| Mean | 13.7% | 16.2% |
| Median | 12.5% | 15.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.9% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.4% | 5.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Chickasaw by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Spanish American Indian (14.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.35%), Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.37%), and Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and Iroquois (14.5%, a difference of 0.96%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #252 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |