Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Laotian Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
 Laotian
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Laotians
11.6%
POVERTY
92.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
106th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Laotian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,789,316 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270 and weighted average of 11.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,750,373 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 0.13%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Laotian | 
| Minimum | 2.4% | 0.072% | 
| Maximum | 19.2% | 28.0% | 
| Range | 16.7% | 27.9% | 
| Mean | 9.5% | 10.3% | 
| Median | 9.3% | 10.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 7.1% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.7% | 12.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 5.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.4% | 5.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 5.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Laotians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Okinawan (11.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (11.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (11.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Palestinian (11.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Canadian (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95  | Exceptional 11.4%  | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101  | Exceptional 11.5%  | 
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #106  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Palestinians | 91.8 /100 | #107  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Canadians | 91.7 /100 | #108  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 91.7 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| French Canadians | 91.0 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.8 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Belarus | 90.8 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 11.6%  | 
| Immigrants | China | 90.7 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 11.6%  |