Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Chickasaw
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,792,147 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.547 and weighted average of 5.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 42.8%.
![Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/ambulatory-disability/immigrants-from-zimbabwe-vs-chickasaw-ambulatory-disability-chart.webp)
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 0.34% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 24.9% | 29.7% |
Range | 24.5% | 28.2% |
Mean | 7.1% | 12.1% |
Median | 5.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 8.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.9% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.9% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by Ambulatory Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Brazil (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Lithuania (5.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belgium (5.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Spain (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | Spain | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Immigrants | France | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 5.6% |
Laotians | 99.7 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Dutch West Indian (8.2%, a difference of 1.7%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |