Immigrants from Australia vs Celtic Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,813,318 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370 and weighted average of 4.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 9.0%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Australia	Celtic
Minimum	1.3%	1.3%
Maximum	23.4%	100.0%
Range	22.1%	98.7%
Mean	6.0%	8.7%
Median	4.3%	5.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	3.2%	4.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.0%	9.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.8%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	5.4%	12.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	5.3%	12.1%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Australia by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Australia are Okinawan (4.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Tlingit-Haida (4.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Sweden (4.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (4.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and Czechoslovakian (4.4%, a difference of 0.74%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
French	99.7 /100 \| #55	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	99.7 /100 \| #56	Exceptional 4.3%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	99.7 /100 \| #57	Exceptional 4.3%
Czechoslovakians	99.7 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	99.6 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 4.4%
Tlingit-Haida	99.6 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 4.4%
Okinawans	99.6 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	99.5 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 4.4%
Macedonians	99.4 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Serbia	99.4 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 4.4%
Immigrants \| Canada	99.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 4.4%
Slavs	99.4 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 4.4%
New Zealanders	99.4 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 4.4%

Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
Pakistanis	96.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%