Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Celtic Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,849,753 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.049 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,973,280 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.945 and weighted average of 4.8%, a difference of 12.9%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Middle Africa	Celtic
Minimum	1.6%	1.3%
Maximum	12.6%	100.0%
Range	11.1%	98.7%
Mean	5.4%	8.7%
Median	5.1%	5.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.1%	4.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.0%	9.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.0%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.4%	12.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.4%	12.1%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Middle Africa are Lebanese (5.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Morocco (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Uruguayan (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Belarus (5.4%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Azores	27.5 /100 \| #195	Fair 5.4%
Spaniards	27.4 /100 \| #196	Fair 5.4%
Liberians	26.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Belarus	26.2 /100 \| #198	Fair 5.4%
Uruguayans	25.0 /100 \| #199	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Morocco	24.3 /100 \| #200	Fair 5.4%
Lebanese	24.1 /100 \| #201	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	23.8 /100 \| #202	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%

Demographics Similar to Celtics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Taiwanese (4.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Kenyan (4.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Philippines (4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Indonesia (4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Eastern Asia (4.8%, a difference of 0.48%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	96.4 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	96.2 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 4.7%
Pakistanis	96.2 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 4.7%
Tongans	95.9 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Nepal	95.9 /100 \| #113	Exceptional 4.7%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	95.1 /100 \| #114	Exceptional 4.8%
Taiwanese	94.8 /100 \| #115	Exceptional 4.8%
Celtics	94.8 /100 \| #116	Exceptional 4.8%
Kenyans	94.7 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Philippines	94.6 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	94.0 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 4.8%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	93.4 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 4.8%
Indians (Asian)	93.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 4.8%
Whites/Caucasians	93.1 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 4.8%
Jordanians	93.1 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 4.8%