Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Chinese
11.5%
POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,731,697 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.112 and weighted average of 11.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 20.1%.
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Chinese |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 17.5% | 26.1% |
| Range | 15.6% | 22.7% |
| Mean | 9.1% | 10.2% |
| Median | 9.1% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.6% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.2% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.6% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 5.5% |
Similar Demographics by Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Immigrants from Egypt (11.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from South Africa (11.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Indonesia (11.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Paraguayan (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%), and Australian (11.4%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 94.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.5 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 94.2 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Slavs | 93.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 11.5% |
| Laotians | 92.4 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Okinawans | 92.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Native Hawaiians | 92.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Portuguese | 92.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Taiwan (9.7%, a difference of 1.9%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
| Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |