Croatian vs Lithuanian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Croatian
Lithuanian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Croatians
Lithuanians
3.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
11th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Croatian vs Lithuanian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 371,918,028 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,141,863 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.067 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 0.56%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Croatian | Lithuanian |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 28.1% | 14.7% |
| Range | 26.3% | 13.1% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 4.6% |
| Median | 4.8% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 3.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.0% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 2.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 2.7% |
Demographics Similar to Croatians and Lithuanians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Croatians are Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 0.44%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Luxembourger (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Carpatho Rusyn (3.9%, a difference of 0.51%), Bulgarian (4.0%, a difference of 0.70%), Thai (3.9%, a difference of 1.0%), Latvian (3.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and Czech (4.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.6% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 3.7% |
| Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 3.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |