Ethiopian vs Polish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Polish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Ethiopians
Poles
5.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
68.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
161st/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Polish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,211,608 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,544,798 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 26.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Polish |
| Minimum | 1.1% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 22.9% | 53.2% |
| Range | 21.8% | 52.1% |
| Mean | 6.0% | 6.2% |
| Median | 4.6% | 3.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.3% | 3.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.3% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.0% | 2.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Delaware | 73.7 /100 | #154 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 72.4 /100 | #155 | Good 5.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 72.2 /100 | #156 | Good 5.1% |
| Argentineans | 70.7 /100 | #157 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 70.4 /100 | #158 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 70.3 /100 | #159 | Good 5.1% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 68.5 /100 | #160 | Good 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 68.1 /100 | #161 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.5 /100 | #162 | Good 5.1% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 64.1 /100 | #163 | Good 5.1% |
| Hawaiians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 62.2 /100 | #165 | Good 5.1% |
| Paraguayans | 61.5 /100 | #166 | Good 5.1% |
| Costa Ricans | 61.5 /100 | #167 | Good 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 54.9 /100 | #168 | Average 5.2% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.070%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |