Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Costa Rica Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,211,608 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 203,682,696 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Costa Rica and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 6.5%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ethiopian	Immigrants from Costa Rica
Minimum	1.1%	0.67%
Maximum	22.9%	22.7%
Range	21.8%	22.1%
Mean	6.0%	5.8%
Median	4.6%	5.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.3%	3.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.3%	6.6%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.0%	3.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.0%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.9%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Delaware	73.7 /100 \| #154	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%
Argentineans	70.7 /100 \| #157	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	70.4 /100 \| #158	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	70.3 /100 \| #159	Good 5.1%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.5 /100 \| #160	Good 5.1%
Ethiopians	68.1 /100 \| #161	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	66.5 /100 \| #162	Good 5.1%
Sierra Leoneans	64.1 /100 \| #163	Good 5.1%
Hawaiians	62.3 /100 \| #164	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	62.2 /100 \| #165	Good 5.1%
Paraguayans	61.5 /100 \| #166	Good 5.1%
Costa Ricans	61.5 /100 \| #167	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Uganda	54.9 /100 \| #168	Average 5.2%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Costa Rica are Chippewa (5.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Osage (5.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Africa (5.5%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from Peru (5.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and French American Indian (5.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Liberians	26.3 /100 \| #197	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Belarus	26.2 /100 \| #198	Fair 5.4%
Uruguayans	25.0 /100 \| #199	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Morocco	24.3 /100 \| #200	Fair 5.4%
Lebanese	24.1 /100 \| #201	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Middle Africa	23.8 /100 \| #202	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Peru	21.8 /100 \| #203	Fair 5.4%
Immigrants \| Costa Rica	19.4 /100 \| #204	Poor 5.4%
Chippewa	18.9 /100 \| #205	Poor 5.4%
Osage	18.4 /100 \| #206	Poor 5.4%
Immigrants \| Africa	17.6 /100 \| #207	Poor 5.5%
French American Indians	16.1 /100 \| #208	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Syria	15.4 /100 \| #209	Poor 5.5%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	14.4 /100 \| #210	Poor 5.5%
Nigerians	14.3 /100 \| #211	Poor 5.5%