Tsimshian vs Subsaharan African Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Tsimshian
Subsaharan African
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Tsimshian
Sub-Saharan Africans
5.9%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
249th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
4.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tsimshian vs Subsaharan African Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 15,607,762 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Tsimshian and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.473 and weighted average of 5.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,239,511 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 4.0%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tsimshian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.8% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 16.0% | 44.2% |
Range | 14.2% | 42.0% |
Mean | 5.9% | 10.4% |
Median | 4.2% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.1% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.5% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.9% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.8% | 9.7% |
Demographics Similar to Tsimshian and Sub-Saharan Africans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Tsimshian are Cree (5.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Iraqi (5.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Venezuela (5.8%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and Chickasaw (5.8%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Moroccan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Iraq (5.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Laos (5.7%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Colombia (5.7%, a difference of 0.79%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (5.7%, a difference of 0.80%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |
Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |