Ethiopian vs Nonimmigrants Married-Couple Family Poverty

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,211,608 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.393 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 567,493,090 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.665 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 4.0%.

Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary

Measurement	Ethiopian	Nonimmigrants
Minimum	1.1%	3.6%
Maximum	22.9%	13.9%
Range	21.8%	10.3%
Mean	6.0%	6.9%
Median	4.6%	6.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	4.3%	5.1%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	6.3%	8.1%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.0%	3.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.0%	2.3%
Standard Deviation (Population)	3.9%	2.2%

Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty

Demographics Similar to Ethiopians by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Pennsylvania German (5.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.1%, a difference of 0.31%), and Argentinean (5.1%, a difference of 0.36%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Delaware	73.7 /100 \| #154	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Ethiopia	72.4 /100 \| #155	Good 5.1%
Sri Lankans	72.2 /100 \| #156	Good 5.1%
Argentineans	70.7 /100 \| #157	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	70.4 /100 \| #158	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Saudi Arabia	70.3 /100 \| #159	Good 5.1%
Pennsylvania Germans	68.5 /100 \| #160	Good 5.1%
Ethiopians	68.1 /100 \| #161	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	66.5 /100 \| #162	Good 5.1%
Sierra Leoneans	64.1 /100 \| #163	Good 5.1%
Hawaiians	62.3 /100 \| #164	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	62.2 /100 \| #165	Good 5.1%
Paraguayans	61.5 /100 \| #166	Good 5.1%
Costa Ricans	61.5 /100 \| #167	Good 5.1%
Immigrants \| Uganda	54.9 /100 \| #168	Average 5.2%

Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants by Married-Couple Family Poverty

In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are American (5.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Hungarian (5.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Peruvian (5.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Vietnam (5.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Albania (5.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Married-Couple Family Poverty
Immigrants \| Kazakhstan	45.1 /100 \| #177	Average 5.2%
Immigrants \| Ukraine	44.9 /100 \| #178	Average 5.2%
Spanish	41.4 /100 \| #179	Average 5.3%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	39.3 /100 \| #180	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Chile	38.8 /100 \| #181	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Vietnam	37.7 /100 \| #182	Fair 5.3%
Peruvians	37.6 /100 \| #183	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Nonimmigrants	35.8 /100 \| #184	Fair 5.3%
Americans	35.4 /100 \| #185	Fair 5.3%
Hungarians	34.7 /100 \| #186	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Albania	33.8 /100 \| #187	Fair 5.3%
Israelis	33.1 /100 \| #188	Fair 5.3%
South American Indians	32.5 /100 \| #189	Fair 5.3%
Ugandans	31.6 /100 \| #190	Fair 5.3%
Immigrants \| Cabo Verde	30.9 /100 \| #191	Fair 5.3%