Australian vs Subsaharan African Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Subsaharan African
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Australians
Sub-Saharan Africans
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
4.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
229th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Subsaharan African Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,779,850 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.805 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 501,239,511 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619 and weighted average of 5.7%, a difference of 31.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Subsaharan African |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 73.3% | 44.2% |
Range | 72.2% | 42.0% |
Mean | 6.5% | 10.4% |
Median | 4.1% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.2% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 10.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.7% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.7% | 9.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.6% | 9.7% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Australians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Turkish (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.18%), British (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Northern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Moroccan (5.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Arab (5.7%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Iraq (5.7%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Laos (5.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and Immigrants from Zaire (5.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 4.9 /100 | #229 | Tragic 5.7% |
Moroccans | 4.9 /100 | #230 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 4.4 /100 | #231 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.4 /100 | #232 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 3.7 /100 | #234 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 5.7% |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |