U.S. Virgin Islander vs Polish Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
U.S. Virgin Islander
Polish
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
U.S. Virgin Islanders
Poles
6.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
296th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
U.S. Virgin Islander vs Polish Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,431,067 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of U.S. Virgin Islanders and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.335 and weighted average of 6.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 546,544,798 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 4.0%, a difference of 65.2%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | U.S. Virgin Islander | Polish |
Minimum | 0.18% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 28.1% | 53.2% |
Range | 27.9% | 52.1% |
Mean | 6.9% | 6.2% |
Median | 6.1% | 3.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.7% | 5.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.2% | 2.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 8.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to U.S. Virgin Islanders are Kiowa (6.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Guyana (6.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (6.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Bahamian (6.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and Nicaraguan (6.7%, a difference of 0.62%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Nepalese | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 6.5% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 6.5% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 6.6% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 6.6% |
Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 6.6% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 6.6% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 6.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 6.7% |
Nicaraguans | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 6.7% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 6.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 6.8% |
Demographics Similar to Poles by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Slovak (4.0%, a difference of 0.030%), Czech (4.0%, a difference of 0.070%), German (4.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Filipino (4.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Italian (4.0%, a difference of 0.31%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Croatians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Slovaks | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Poles | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Germans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Italians | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Zimbabweans | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 4.1% |