Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Dutch West Indian
Chickasaw
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Dutch West Indians
Chickasaw
8.2%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
337th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.0%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch West Indian vs Chickasaw Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,765,361 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Dutch West Indians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.250 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,679,473 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.304 and weighted average of 8.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch West Indian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 3.6% | 1.5% |
| Maximum | 27.7% | 29.7% |
| Range | 24.1% | 28.2% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 12.1% |
| Median | 10.7% | 11.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.5% | 8.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.9% | 13.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.6% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch West Indians and Chickasaw by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch West Indians are Colville (8.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Pima (8.2%, a difference of 0.92%), Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 1.6%), Choctaw (8.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 2.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Seminole (8.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Yuman (7.9%, a difference of 1.1%), Cherokee (7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), Colville (8.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and Pima (8.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 7.5% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 7.6% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 7.7% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 7.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 8.0% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 8.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 8.3% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 8.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 8.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 8.7% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 8.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 8.9% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 9.3% |