Immigrants from Latvia vs Soviet Union Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
 Soviet Union
 Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Soviet Union
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latvia vs Soviet Union Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,716,282 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latvia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.162 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,449,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 1.1%.
 
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Latvia | Soviet Union | 
| Minimum | 1.6% | 0.56% | 
| Maximum | 20.7% | 26.3% | 
| Range | 19.1% | 25.7% | 
| Mean | 9.4% | 9.6% | 
| Median | 9.4% | 9.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 5.7% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 12.7% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 7.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.7% | 5.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latvia and Soviet Union by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latvia are Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%), and Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.17%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty | 
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105  | Exceptional 12.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112  | Exceptional 12.6%  | 
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114  | Exceptional 12.7%  | 
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115  | Exceptional 12.7%  |