Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Soviet Union Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Soviet Union
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Soviet Union
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
92.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
111th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Soviet Union Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,071,275 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,449,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Soviet Union and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 12.6%, a difference of 0.80%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Soviet Union |
| Minimum | 5.8% | 0.56% |
| Maximum | 62.5% | 26.3% |
| Range | 56.7% | 25.7% |
| Mean | 13.4% | 9.6% |
| Median | 12.2% | 9.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 12.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 5.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Soviet Union by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Argentinean (12.8%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Soviet Union are Immigrants from Israel (12.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.17%), Paraguayan (12.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (12.6%, a difference of 0.25%), and Portuguese (12.6%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Paraguayans | 93.0 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Soviet Union | 92.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 92.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Canadians | 92.0 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
| South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |