Osage vs Australian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Osage
Australian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Osage
Australians
24.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
88.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Australian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,495,293 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132 and weighted average of 24.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,875,753 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.723 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 20.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Osage | Australian |
| Minimum | 10.2% | 8.1% |
| Maximum | 50.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 39.8% | 91.9% |
| Mean | 29.5% | 31.8% |
| Median | 30.1% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 23.6% | 19.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.7% | 33.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.1% | 14.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.7% | 22.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 22.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Osage by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Alsatian (24.5%, a difference of 0.37%), American (24.5%, a difference of 0.44%), French American Indian (24.6%, a difference of 0.59%), Indonesian (24.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and U.S. Virgin Islander (24.2%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 24.1% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 24.2% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 24.2% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 24.3% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 24.4% |
| Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 24.5% |
| Americans | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 24.5% |
| French American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 24.6% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Immigrants | Central America | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 24.8% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 24.9% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uganda (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.35%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |