Spaniard vs Ugandan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Spaniard
Ugandan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Spaniards
Ugandans
13.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
18.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.0%
FEMALE POVERTY
15.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Spaniard vs Ugandan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,063,734 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Spaniards and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 13.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,995,237 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.133 and weighted average of 14.0%, a difference of 0.56%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Spaniard | Ugandan |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.3% |
| Maximum | 68.3% | 30.6% |
| Range | 65.9% | 29.3% |
| Mean | 20.4% | 13.6% |
| Median | 15.9% | 13.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.0% | 16.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.3% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.0% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Spaniards and Ugandans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Spaniards are Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.33%), Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.37%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 0.84%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Uruguay (14.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Western Asia (13.9%, a difference of 0.84%), Hmong (13.9%, a difference of 0.89%), Immigrants from Kenya (13.9%, a difference of 0.90%), and Spanish (13.9%, a difference of 0.94%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Delaware | 31.1 /100 | #194 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | South America | 30.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 13.7% |
| South American Indians | 28.9 /100 | #196 | Fair 13.7% |
| Arabs | 28.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 28.5 /100 | #198 | Fair 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 25.6 /100 | #199 | Fair 13.8% |
| Spanish | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 21.1 /100 | #201 | Fair 13.9% |
| Hmong | 21.1 /100 | #202 | Fair 13.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 20.7 /100 | #203 | Fair 13.9% |
| Spaniards | 18.9 /100 | #204 | Poor 13.9% |
| Ugandans | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 14.0 /100 | #206 | Poor 14.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 9.0 /100 | #207 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 7.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Panamanians | 7.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Malaysians | 7.4 /100 | #210 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Moroccans | 7.2 /100 | #211 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Bermudans | 5.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 5.3 /100 | #213 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Marshallese | 5.0 /100 | #214 | Tragic 14.4% |