Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Bangladeshi
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Bangladeshis
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
244th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Bangladeshi Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,342,221 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.056 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,885,862 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bangladeshis and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 3.8%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Bangladeshi |
| Minimum | 1.7% | 0.85% |
| Maximum | 17.6% | 18.9% |
| Range | 16.0% | 18.1% |
| Mean | 7.8% | 7.0% |
| Median | 7.0% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.6% | 9.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.4% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Bangladeshis by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Somali (5.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (5.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bangladeshis are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants (6.0%, a difference of 0.37%), Comanche (6.0%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Somalia (6.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and African (6.0%, a difference of 0.71%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
| Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |