Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Argentinean Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Argentinean
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Argentineans
12.7%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Argentinean Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,071,275 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419 and weighted average of 12.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,942,880 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270 and weighted average of 12.8%, a difference of 0.23%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Argentinean |
Minimum | 5.8% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 62.5% | 23.9% |
Range | 56.7% | 22.4% |
Mean | 13.4% | 10.5% |
Median | 12.2% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.6% | 8.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 13.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 4.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Argentineans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Eastern Asia are French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (12.7%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), New Zealander (12.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and Albanian (12.7%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (12.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Ukraine (12.8%, a difference of 0.070%), South African (12.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belarus (12.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and French Canadian (12.7%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Puget Sound Salish | 91.5 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 91.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 90.9 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Sri Lankans | 90.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Albanians | 90.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 12.7% |
New Zealanders | 90.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 90.3 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 12.7% |
French Canadians | 90.2 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 12.7% |
Immigrants | Norway | 89.3 /100 | #124 | Excellent 12.8% |
Argentineans | 89.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 88.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 12.8% |
South Africans | 88.4 /100 | #127 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 88.2 /100 | #128 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |