Puget Sound Salish vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Puget Sound Salish
Moroccan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Puget Sound Salish
Moroccans
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
79.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
151st/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Puget Sound Salish vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,841,624 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Puget Sound Salish and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.127 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 2.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Puget Sound Salish | Moroccan |
Minimum | 8.6% | 10.5% |
Maximum | 40.8% | 53.5% |
Range | 32.2% | 43.0% |
Mean | 20.9% | 24.5% |
Median | 20.0% | 20.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.4% | 18.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.0% | 31.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 13.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 10.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Puget Sound Salish and Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Puget Sound Salish are Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.27%), Samoan (20.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.56%), Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.66%), and Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |
Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |