Yugoslavian vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yugoslavian
Moroccan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Yugoslavians
Moroccans
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
35.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
188th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yugoslavian vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 282,795,313 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 1.1%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Yugoslavian | Moroccan |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 50.2% | 53.5% |
| Range | 48.2% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 22.1% | 24.5% |
| Median | 20.5% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.0% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.9% | 31.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.4% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.3% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians and Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nigeria (21.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Hawaiian (21.2%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
| Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |