Immigrants from Norway vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Moroccan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Moroccans
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
167th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
52.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Moroccan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,651,083 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.323 and weighted average of 20.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,405,308 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 21.0%, a difference of 0.66%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Moroccan |
| Minimum | 9.8% | 10.5% |
| Maximum | 65.2% | 53.5% |
| Range | 55.4% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 25.7% | 24.5% |
| Median | 21.2% | 20.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.7% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 31.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.6% | 13.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.8% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.4% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway and Moroccans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Norwegian (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Ugandan (20.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Iraqi (20.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and Lebanese (20.8%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Guyanese (21.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Guyana (21.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Cuban (21.0%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Costa Ricans | 71.8 /100 | #159 | Good 20.7% |
| Arabs | 70.8 /100 | #160 | Good 20.7% |
| Kenyans | 68.5 /100 | #161 | Good 20.8% |
| Northern Europeans | 68.4 /100 | #162 | Good 20.8% |
| Lebanese | 67.6 /100 | #163 | Good 20.8% |
| Iraqis | 64.5 /100 | #164 | Good 20.8% |
| Ugandans | 64.0 /100 | #165 | Good 20.8% |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |