Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,606,017 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tlingit-Haida and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 9.2%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Tlingit-Haida	Immigrants from China
Minimum	0.43%	1.1%
Maximum	50.0%	24.4%
Range	49.6%	23.3%
Mean	16.8%	12.0%
Median	15.6%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	7.0%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	25.7%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	18.7%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.0%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	11.8%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Tlingit-Haida by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Tlingit-Haida are Immigrants from Russia (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Argentinean (14.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Turkey (14.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Egyptian (14.7%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Eastern Europe (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.6%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.1 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Austria	98.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 14.6%
Taiwanese	98.0 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	98.0 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Russia	97.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 14.7%
Tlingit-Haida	97.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 14.7%
Argentineans	97.9 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 14.7%
Immigrants \| Turkey	97.9 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 14.7%
Egyptians	97.9 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 14.7%
Ukrainians	97.7 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 14.7%
Macedonians	97.6 /100 \| #82	Exceptional 14.7%
Immigrants \| Italy	97.4 /100 \| #83	Exceptional 14.8%
Soviet Union	97.3 /100 \| #84	Exceptional 14.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%