Immigrants from Argentina vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,133,430 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 14.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 8.4%.

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Laotian (14.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Slovene (14.6%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Netherlands (14.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).