Carpatho Rusyn vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,411,272 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.648 and weighted average of 15.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,396,670 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 14.4%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Carpatho Rusyn	Immigrants from China
Minimum	3.6%	1.1%
Maximum	63.2%	24.4%
Range	59.5%	23.3%
Mean	17.5%	12.0%
Median	14.2%	11.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	9.1%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.2%	14.0%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	11.2%	5.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	12.9%	4.7%
Standard Deviation (Population)	12.7%	4.7%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

Demographics Similar to Carpatho Rusyns by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Irish (15.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (15.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Portuguese (15.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Scottish (15.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Norway (15.4%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| North Macedonia	93.1 /100 \| #117	Exceptional 15.2%
Immigrants \| Southern Europe	92.7 /100 \| #118	Exceptional 15.3%
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	92.5 /100 \| #119	Exceptional 15.3%
Pakistanis	92.3 /100 \| #120	Exceptional 15.3%
English	92.2 /100 \| #121	Exceptional 15.3%
Portuguese	91.8 /100 \| #122	Exceptional 15.3%
Irish	91.5 /100 \| #123	Exceptional 15.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	91.4 /100 \| #124	Exceptional 15.3%
Peruvians	91.2 /100 \| #125	Exceptional 15.4%
Scottish	91.0 /100 \| #126	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Norway	90.8 /100 \| #127	Exceptional 15.4%
Albanians	90.5 /100 \| #128	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| South Eastern Asia	90.5 /100 \| #129	Exceptional 15.4%
Puget Sound Salish	90.1 /100 \| #130	Exceptional 15.4%
Immigrants \| Western Europe	90.0 /100 \| #131	Exceptional 15.4%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.4%, a difference of 0.46%), Norwegian (13.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.78%), and Latvian (13.5%, a difference of 0.81%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Korea	99.9 /100 \| #18	Exceptional 13.1%
Cypriots	99.9 /100 \| #19	Exceptional 13.2%
Immigrants \| Japan	99.9 /100 \| #20	Exceptional 13.3%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.9 /100 \| #21	Exceptional 13.3%
Indians (Asian)	99.9 /100 \| #22	Exceptional 13.3%
Norwegians	99.9 /100 \| #23	Exceptional 13.3%
Immigrants \| Eastern Asia	99.9 /100 \| #24	Exceptional 13.4%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.4%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Latvians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Tongans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.6%
Bolivians	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Asians	99.7 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.7%
Turks	99.7 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.7%
Danes	99.7 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.7%